Nine Months, No Solicitor, One Position Statement - How one father won back contact with his daughter by learning to work the system, not fight it

In 2020, Shane Paul spent nine months separated from his daughter. By the end of that year, he'd secured a child arrangement order and rebuilt contact with her, and he did it representing himself in family court, without a solicitor, while his ex-partner had legal aid and full representation throughout the whole process.

He describes being incensed at how unfair that imbalance felt, one parent with a fully funded barrister, the other working it out alone. What changed things for him wasn't winning the argument about fairness, it was accepting that the system runs on a set process regardless of how anyone feels about it, and putting his energy into learning that process properly instead of fighting how unjust it felt.

Part of what he was navigating was parental alienation, one parent working to turn a child against the other. He's been open that this was something he experienced directly, not just something he read about. CAFCASS gets involved specifically to assess situations like this, looking at the child's home environment and identifying whether alienation is actually happening before making a recommendation to the court. His advice on that front is deliberately unglamorous: don't argue about it emotionally, gather evidence calmly and specifically, and let that evidence do the work instead of your frustration.

Three things made the practical difference, in his own account. First, understanding what a judge actually needs in order to make a decision, not just what feels true or fair to say out loud in the room. Second, writing a clear, well-structured Position Statement, the document that sets out your situation and what outcome you're asking for, since a judge is working from what's on paper as much as what's said in the hearing itself. Third, treating the process itself, however slow or confusing it felt, as something to learn rather than something to resist.

None of that required a solicitor. It required knowing what the process actually asked of him, and being prepared enough to meet it. He's since founded A Father's Friend, a registered company based in Scarborough, and now works as a McKenzie Friend himself, someone who sits alongside a litigant in person in court, offering support, notes, and quiet advice, without being a qualified lawyer. It's a formally recognised role in the family court system, and it exists precisely because so many people are navigating this process without representation and need exactly the kind of insider understanding he once had to learn the hard way.

This is exactly the gap I've been working on with CasePath. Not a replacement for legal advice where you genuinely need it, but the same kind of thing Shane describes: understanding what the process actually requires, and being able to prepare your own paperwork properly, so a lack of money for a solicitor doesn't mean a lack of a fair hearing.

If you're heading into family court without representation, his story is worth sitting with. It's not about the system being fair. It's about learning it well enough to work within it, evidence over emotion, preparation over frustration, and that's something you can do without spending money you don't have.

More like this every week, subscribe to my newsletter here.